Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Transient fault representativenesses comparison analysis

  • Lin Chen*
  • , Chao Wang
  • , Yan Wang
  • , Jie Xiang Kang
  • , Bin Zha
  • , Sheng Yi Zhao
  • , Bin Li
  • , Zhong Chuan Fu
  • , Yu Ying Wang
  • , Gang Cui
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology
  • China National Aeronautical Radio Electronics Research Institute

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

As semiconductor technology scales into deep submicron regime, transient fault vulnerability of both combinational logic and sequential logic increase rapidly. It is predicted that in 2011 transient fault rate of combinational logic will overtake that of sequential logic in processor. In this paper, particle radiation-induced multi-bit transient faults in Decoder unit, representative combinational logic components in SPARC processor, are simulated under different fault injection method, namely simulation-based fault injection and compilation supported static fault injection respectively. Fault representativenesses observed in both fault injection experiments are analyzed, and the inaccuracy factors of the static error injection method are put forward.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2011 International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, iTAP 2011 - Proceedings
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Event2011 International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, iTAP 2011 - Wuhan, China
Duration: 16 Aug 201118 Aug 2011

Publication series

Name2011 International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, iTAP 2011 - Proceedings

Conference

Conference2011 International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, iTAP 2011
Country/TerritoryChina
CityWuhan
Period16/08/1118/08/11

Keywords

  • Combinational logic
  • Fault injection
  • Multi-bit transient fault

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transient fault representativenesses comparison analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this