Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The safety of ovarian preservation in stage i endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on propensity score matching

  • Ting Hou
  • , Yidi Sun
  • , Junyi Li
  • , Chenglin Liu
  • , Zhen Wang
  • , Yixue Li*
  • , Yuan Lu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • East China University of Science and Technology
  • CAS - Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Fudan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Most patients with early stage endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEAC) are treated with hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. But this surgical menopause leads to long-term sequelae for premenopausal women, especially for young women of childbearing age. This population-based study was to evaluate the safety of ovarian preservation in young women with stage I EEAC. Methods: Patients of age 50 or younger with stage I EEAC were explored from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program database during 2004 to 2013. Propensity score matching was used to randomize the data set and reduce the selection biases of doctors. Univariate analysis and multivariate cox proportional hazards model were utilized to estimate the safety of ovarian preservation. Results: A total of 7183 patients were identified, and ovarian preservation was performed in 863 (12 %) patients. Compared with women treated with oophorectomy, patients with ovarian preservation significantly tend to be younger at diagnosis (P-value < 0.001) and more likely diagnosed as stage IA EEAC, to have better differentiated tumor tissues and smaller tumors, as well as less likely to undergo radiation and lymphadenectomy. 863 patients treated with oophorectomy were selected by propensity score matching. After propensity score matching, the differences of all characteristics between ovarian preservation and oophorectomy were not significant and potential confounders in the two groups decreased. In univariate analysis of matched population, ovarian preservation had no effect on overall (P-value=0.928) and cancer-specific (P-value=0.390) mortality. In propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis, ovarian preservation was not significantly associated with overall (HR=0.69, 95%CI=0.41-1.68, P-value=0.611) and cancer-specific (HR=1.65, 95%CI=0.54-5.06, P-value=0.379) survival. Conclusion: Ovarian preservation is safe for young women with stage I EEAC, which is not significantly associated with overall and cancer-specific mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-655
Number of pages9
JournalCombinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Endometrioid adenocarcinoma
  • Ovarian preservation
  • Premenopausal women
  • Propensity score matching

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The safety of ovarian preservation in stage i endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on propensity score matching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this