Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The curvilinear effect of negative affect on voice behavior from the perspective of activation theory

  • Long Chen
  • , Kerrie Unsworth
  • , Li Zhang*
  • , Zhen Duo Zhang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Hohai University
  • University of Leeds
  • School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Does negative affect help or hinder voice behavior? Research is increasingly highlighting the more complex effects of negative affect and we propose that its relationship with voice is similarly multifaceted. Drawing from activation theory, this paper argues that the relationship between negative affect and voice behavior is an inverted U-shape. Three studies are designed to test our hypotheses. At the between-person level, Studies 1 and 3 use employee-supervisor matched dyads (N = 209; N = 150; respectively) at two different time points. Study 2 collects 217 daily data points from 58 participants and tests the inverted U-shaped hypothesis at the within-person level. Findings from these studies provide support for our hypotheses that voice behavior is highest when employees experience moderate-level negative affect but that extremely high and low levels of negative affect hinder voice behavior. In study 3 we also found that the inverted U-shaped relationship between negative affect and voice behavior is only prominent when the need for change is higher. Our findings have implications in revealing the complex nature of negative affect in determining voice behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27497-27515
Number of pages19
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume42
Issue number31
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Activation theory
  • Inverted U-shape
  • Need for change
  • Negative affect
  • Voice behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The curvilinear effect of negative affect on voice behavior from the perspective of activation theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this