Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tackling activity-stability paradox of reconstructed NiIrOx electrocatalysts by bridged W-O moiety

  • Muhammad Imran Abdullah
  • , Yusheng Fang
  • , Xiaobing Wu
  • , Meiqi Hu
  • , Jing Shao*
  • , Youkun Tao*
  • , Haijiang Wang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology
  • Shenzhen University
  • Southern University of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

One challenge remaining in the development of Ir-based electrocatalyst is the activity-stability paradox during acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER), especially for the surface reconstructed IrOx catalyst with high efficiency. To address this, a phase selective Ir-based electrocatalyst is constructed by forming bridged W-O moiety in NiIrOx electrocatalyst. Through an electrochemical dealloying process, an nano-porous structure with surface-hydroxylated rutile NiWIrOx electrocatalyst is engineered via Ni as a sacrificial element. Despite low Ir content, NiWIrOx demonstrates a minimal overpotential of 180 mV for the OER at 10 mA·cm−2. It maintains a stable 300 mA·cm−2 current density during an approximately 300 h OER at 1.8 VRHE and shows a stability number of 3.9 × 105 noxygen · nIr−1. The resulting W – O–Ir bridging motif proves pivotal for enhancing the efficacy of OER catalysis by facilitating deprotonation of OER intermediates and promoting a thermodynamically favorable dual-site adsorbent evolution mechanism. Besides, the phase selective insertion of W-O in NiIrOx enabling charge balance through the W-O-Ir bridging motif, effectively counteracting lattice oxygen loss by regulating Ir-O co-valency.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10587
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tackling activity-stability paradox of reconstructed NiIrOx electrocatalysts by bridged W-O moiety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this