Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels

Yuxia Duan; Hai Zhang; Xavier P.V. Maldague; Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo; Pierre Servais; Marc Genest; Stefano Sfarra; Jianqiao Meng

doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010

Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels

Yuxia Duan^*
, Hai Zhang
, Xavier P.V. Maldague
, Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo
, Pierre Servais
, Marc Genest
, Stefano Sfarra
, Jianqiao Meng

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Physics
Université Laval
Societé NDT Pro
National Research Council of Canada
University of L'Aquila
Tomsk Polytechnic University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

73 Scopus citations

Abstract

In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a_90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	77-83
Number of pages	7
Journal	NDT and E International
Volume	102
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010
State	Published - Mar 2019
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

CFRP
Impact damage
Probability of detection
Thermography
Ultrasonic testing

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010

Cite this

@article{f19d3e36a940455ba76658d89cb96942,

title = "Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels",

abstract = "In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90\% PoD with 95\% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.",

keywords = "CFRP, Impact damage, Probability of detection, Thermography, Ultrasonic testing",

author = "Yuxia Duan and Hai Zhang and Maldague, \{Xavier P.V.\} and Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo and Pierre Servais and Marc Genest and Stefano Sfarra and Jianqiao Meng",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2019",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010",

language = "英语",

volume = "102",

pages = "77--83",

journal = "NDT and E International",

issn = "0963-8695",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels

AU - Duan, Yuxia

AU - Zhang, Hai

AU - Maldague, Xavier P.V.

AU - Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente

AU - Servais, Pierre

AU - Genest, Marc

AU - Sfarra, Stefano

AU - Meng, Jianqiao

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.

AB - In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.

KW - CFRP

KW - Impact damage

KW - Probability of detection

KW - Thermography

KW - Ultrasonic testing

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85059303379

U2 - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010

M3 - 文章

AN - SCOPUS:85059303379

SN - 0963-8695

VL - 102

SP - 77

EP - 83

JO - NDT and E International

JF - NDT and E International

ER -

Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this