TY - GEN
T1 - Quick Best Action Identification in Linear Bandit Problems
AU - Geng, Jun
AU - Lai, Lifeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/7/2
Y1 - 2018/7/2
N2 - In this paper, we consider a best action identification problem in the stochastic linear bandit setup with a fixed confident constraint. In the considered best action identification problem, instead of minimizing the accumulative regret as done in existing works, the learner aims to obtain an accurate estimate of the underlying parameter based on his action and reward sequences. To improve the estimation efficiency, the learner is allowed to select his action based his historical information; hence the whole procedure is designed in a sequential adaptive manner. We first show that the existing algorithms designed to minimize the accumulative regret is not a consistent estimator and hence is not a good policy for our problem. We then characterize a lower bound on the estimation error for any policy. We further design a simple policy and show that the estimation error of the designed policy achieves the same scaling order as that of the derived lower bound.
AB - In this paper, we consider a best action identification problem in the stochastic linear bandit setup with a fixed confident constraint. In the considered best action identification problem, instead of minimizing the accumulative regret as done in existing works, the learner aims to obtain an accurate estimate of the underlying parameter based on his action and reward sequences. To improve the estimation efficiency, the learner is allowed to select his action based his historical information; hence the whole procedure is designed in a sequential adaptive manner. We first show that the existing algorithms designed to minimize the accumulative regret is not a consistent estimator and hence is not a good policy for our problem. We then characterize a lower bound on the estimation error for any policy. We further design a simple policy and show that the estimation error of the designed policy achieves the same scaling order as that of the derived lower bound.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062948956
U2 - 10.1109/ACSSC.2018.8645353
DO - 10.1109/ACSSC.2018.8645353
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85062948956
T3 - Conference Record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers
SP - 1312
EP - 1316
BT - Conference Record of the 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, ACSSC 2018
A2 - Matthews, Michael B.
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, ACSSC 2018
Y2 - 28 October 2018 through 31 October 2018
ER -