Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance comparisons of a content-addressable storage network system and other typical IP-SAN based storage systems

  • Yi Jinsong*
  • , Wang Chunlu
  • , Liu Chuanyi
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Bank of China
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Content-Addressable Storage (CAS) is a model of storage facility used for keeping immutable digital content records with peculiar advantages. This paper presents a prototype of CAS Area Network system compliant to the OSD (Object-based Storage Device) T-10 standard. The experimental results demonstrate the performance of the model is comparable to and better than that of regular storage systems. The directions about bottleneck and optimization of the real system accord with the conclusions deduced by our performance evaluation model.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, ICICTA 2011
Pages1142-1145
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event2011 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, ICICTA 2011 - Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Duration: 28 Mar 201129 Mar 2011

Publication series

NameProceedings - 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, ICICTA 2011
Volume2

Conference

Conference2011 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, ICICTA 2011
Country/TerritoryChina
CityShenzhen, Guangdong
Period28/03/1129/03/11

Keywords

  • Content-Addressable Storage (CAS)
  • Cryptographic Hash Functions
  • chunk
  • object ID (Identifier)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance comparisons of a content-addressable storage network system and other typical IP-SAN based storage systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this