Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pareto-optimal design of UHF antenna using modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II

  • Feng Bin
  • , Feng Wang
  • , She Chen*
  • , Qiuqin Sun
  • , Lipeng Zhong
  • , Shu Lin
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Hunan University
  • Yili Normal University
  • School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this study, the ultra-high-frequency (UHF) antenna for partial discharge (PD) detection is optimised to simultaneously satisfy the requirements of low return loss and high fidelity factor (FF) in the frequency band of interest by using the modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (MNSGA-II). Based on the labour division strategy, the MNSGA-II adopts an adaptive crossover and mutation possibilities instead of the fixed ones, resulting in the significant improvement of convergence rate and exploration ability. One of the Pareto-optimal solutions is presented as the authors’ proposed UHF antenna, whose performance is compared with those of both the antenna optimised by genetic algorithm and the existing wideband antennas. The experimental results show that the proposed antenna with a compact size of 0.201 λL × 0.198 λL realises the reflection coefficient less than −10 dB from 490 MHz to 1.52 GHz, and its FFs in the face-to-face and side-by-side scenarios are 0.897 and 0.845, respectively. Furthermore, the simulation results reveal that the high FF of antenna greatly increases the accuracy of PD source localisation. It indicates that the MNSGA-II provides an excellent solution to the multiobjective optimisation problems in antenna design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1404-1410
Number of pages7
JournalIET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pareto-optimal design of UHF antenna using modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this