Abstract
This review addresses the challenges of obtaining high-quality quantitative data in the optical imaging of membrane voltage and calcium dynamics. The paper provides a comprehensive overview and systematization of recent studies that analyze factors limiting signal fidelity and propose strategies to enhance data quality. The primary sources of signal degradation in biological optical imaging, with an emphasis on membrane voltage and calcium imaging, are systematically explored across four major indicator classes: voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs), genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs), calcium-sensitive dyes (CSDs), and genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs). Common mechanisms that compromise data quality are classified into three main categories: fundamental photon shot noise, device-related errors, and sample-related measurement errors. For each class of limitation, its physical or biological origin and characteristic manifestations are described, which are followed by an analysis of available mitigation strategies, including hardware optimization, choice of sensors, sample preparation and experimental design, post-processing and computational correction methods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 31 |
| Journal | Biosensors |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- biological imaging
- calcium-sensitive dye (CSD)
- cell membrane voltage
- genetically encoded calcium indicator (GECI)
- genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI)
- membrane voltage imaging
- optical imaging
- signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
- voltage-sensitive dye (VSD)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Noise Sources and Strategies for Signal Quality Improvement in Biological Imaging: A Review Focused on Calcium and Cell Membrane Voltage Imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver