TY - GEN
T1 - Modelling of the Electromagnetic Field Distributions Induced by Different Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil Configurations
AU - Xie, Bin
AU - Deng, Bin
AU - Wang, Jiang
AU - Yi, Guosheng
AU - Song, Zhenxi
AU - Lin, Lin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/7/2
Y1 - 2018/7/2
N2 - As a brain modulation technology, transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS) was favored by its particularly advantages such as non-contact, painless, variety stimulation options. There are two TMS coil configurations which was widely used in the clinical research about neurological and psychiatric disorders, and they are the conventional circular coil and figure-8 coil. Based on the same crafts, six different coil configurations with different loop offset distances between the two were proposed in this paper. For the characterization of magnetic and electric field distributions, finite element method was used in an isotropic human brain model and the penetration depth and stimulation focality were regarded as the two most important indicators. Our results support that the figure-S coil has better focality and penetration depth than conventional circular coil in the circumstance where same current pulse was delivered. As the increasing of loop offset distance, there is an obvious law in the focality of induced electric field. The coil which loop offset distance equals to 20 mm has the best focality. A tradeoff between penetration depth and stimulation focality of electric field induced by the six coil configurations was discovered. For the selection of coil setting and the design of novel coil configuration, the evaluation between these two different needs is considerable.
AB - As a brain modulation technology, transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS) was favored by its particularly advantages such as non-contact, painless, variety stimulation options. There are two TMS coil configurations which was widely used in the clinical research about neurological and psychiatric disorders, and they are the conventional circular coil and figure-8 coil. Based on the same crafts, six different coil configurations with different loop offset distances between the two were proposed in this paper. For the characterization of magnetic and electric field distributions, finite element method was used in an isotropic human brain model and the penetration depth and stimulation focality were regarded as the two most important indicators. Our results support that the figure-S coil has better focality and penetration depth than conventional circular coil in the circumstance where same current pulse was delivered. As the increasing of loop offset distance, there is an obvious law in the focality of induced electric field. The coil which loop offset distance equals to 20 mm has the best focality. A tradeoff between penetration depth and stimulation focality of electric field induced by the six coil configurations was discovered. For the selection of coil setting and the design of novel coil configuration, the evaluation between these two different needs is considerable.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062483641
U2 - 10.1109/WCICA.2018.8630332
DO - 10.1109/WCICA.2018.8630332
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85062483641
T3 - Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA)
SP - 1531
EP - 1536
BT - Proceedings of the 2018 13th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, WCICA 2018
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 13th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, WCICA 2018
Y2 - 4 July 2018 through 8 July 2018
ER -