Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrating life cycle assessment into landscape studies: a postcard from Hulunbuir

  • Susie Ruqun Wu
  • , Xinchao Liu
  • , Lulu Wang
  • , Jiquan Chen
  • , Peiling Zhou
  • , Changliang Shao*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Context: Conventional life cycle assessment (LCA) has been increasingly criticized for lacking spatial information, especially for agricultural systems where high spatial variation and sensitivity is present. Objectives: The objective of this research is twofold: first, to assess the potential environmental impacts and the production efficiency of pastoralism farming, and, second, to identify the influence of the spatial distribution of farms on the environmental impacts, if any. Methods: A cradle-to-gate spatialized agricultural LCA was conducted for 45 farms surveyed from the Hulunbuir Grassland by splitting direct onsite processes from upstream processes, adopting the spatialized characterization factors (SCFs) of IMPACT World+. Results: Contrasting results were observed for different impact categories regarding whether upstream or onsite processes served as the environmental hotspot. While direct onsite animal emissions did not show spatial dependency at the inventory stage, its resulting impact scores demonstrated the most contrasting spatial patterns among various impact categories, depending on whether and how spatial resolution and location were introduced during the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) stage. Statistical evidence supported a high emission cluster for farms located close to Hailar city compared to a low cluster for those located further south/west of the city. Conclusions: A cradle-to-gate spatialized agricultural LCA was proposed and applied to assess the environmental impacts of pastoralism farming in Hulunbuir Grassland. The overall spatial dependency of the LCA results was weak at the individual farm level, if present; it depended on the interactions between the spatial variation within the life cycle inventory and the spatial resolution and location of the SCFs. Environmental burden shifting occurred between different impact categories, and the policy challenge of how to increase production efficiency in the pastoralism system remains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1347-1364
Number of pages18
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Grassland
  • Landscape context
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Pastoralism farming
  • Spatial LCA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating life cycle assessment into landscape studies: a postcard from Hulunbuir'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this