Abstract
The occurrence of redworms in water supplies raises concerns among consumers regarding the safety of their drinking water. In this study, the inactivation effects of three disinfectants, chloramines, chlorine dioxide (CIO2), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), on the redworm (Mono-pylephorus limosus) in tap water were comparatively evaluated. After inactivation, a Photobacterium phosphoreum acute toxicity experiment and a zebrafish embryonic development toxicity experiment were conducted to evaluate the safety of the disinfected water. The results show that chloramines with 4 mg/L residual chlorine has relatively good effect in killing redworm, and the disinfected water maintains low health risks in contrast, the tap water is high toxic after killing redworm with even a low concentration (0.005%) of H2O2, suggesting that H2O2 is probably not a good disinfectant for controlling redworm in water supply; CIO2 at 6-8 mg/L level can inactive redworm effectively while the risk of disinfected water to human health remains low. Based on the overall results of disinfection effectiveness, side-effect chemical safety, and practicality, chloramines and CIO2 appear to be useful in reducing redworm risks in water supplies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2334-2340 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Fresenius Environmental Bulletin |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| State | Published - 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Inactivation
- Redworm
- Safety
- Tap water
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inactivation of monopylephorus limosus by chloramine, chlorine dioxide, and hydrogen dioxide: Effectiveness and safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver