Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Grain geometry dominated mechanical anisotropy in laser powder bed fused IN718 alloy: Insights from in-situ EBSD and DIC

  • Ziyi Ding
  • , Taiqing Deng
  • , Xuewen Li
  • , Kesong Miao
  • , Xiaojun Wang*
  • , Guohua Fan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology
  • China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation
  • Nanjing Tech University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study reveals grain geometry-dominated mechanical anisotropy in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) IN718 via in-situ EBSD and DIC. Despite a nearly random crystallographic orientation, the alloy exhibits significant strength and ductility anisotropy: transverse direction (TD) yield strength exceeds build direction (BD) yield strength by 136 MPa, whereas the uniform elongation is 28.2% lower. Through quantitative analysis of lattice rotation behaviors in grains of varying orientations, sizes, and aspect ratios during early deformation, we introduce an anisotropy coefficient (Ka) quantifying grain size and aspect ratio effects on lattice rotation. Modified strengthening models incorporating Ka demonstrate that strength anisotropy primarily arises from geometry-modulated dislocation, intrinsic, and precipitation strengthening. Ductility anisotropy originates from columnar grain-loading direction coupling: TD tension induces intergranular fracture via premature strain localization at grain boundaries, while BD tension promotes homogeneous deformation and transgranular fracture.

Original languageEnglish
Article number150943
JournalMaterials Science and Engineering: A
Volume975
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • In-situ EBSD
  • IN718
  • Laser powder bed fusion
  • Mechanical anisotropy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Grain geometry dominated mechanical anisotropy in laser powder bed fused IN718 alloy: Insights from in-situ EBSD and DIC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this