TY - GEN
T1 - Forecast UPC-Level FMCG Demand, Part IV
T2 - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2018
AU - Yang, Dazhi
AU - Zhang, Allan N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/7/2
Y1 - 2018/7/2
N2 - Improving forecast accuracy is a major goal of statisticians and forecast practitioners. over the years, many advanced models have been proposed in forecasting studies in various science and engineering domains. It is no exception for the fast-moving-consumer-goods (FMCG) demand forecasting. However, in the literature of FMCG forecasting, there are many contradictory conclusions about the best model, typified by the long-lasting »war» between econometrics and neural networks. This is simply because there is no universal model. Whereas one model may outperform another over one dataset, its performance can be rather limited over other datasets. Hence, when forecasting is required for a new dataset, a forecaster is risking a suboptimal performance, if the model selection is based on other datasets. To minimize that risk, ensemble forecasting is often considered. This paper continues from the previous discussion (see Parts I-III) on UPC-level FMCG demand forecasting. Various statistical ensemble techniques are used to combine forecasts made using a collection of component models. It is found that the risk (measured by the spread of model-led error) of using ensemble is smaller than using a single component model. Furthermore, in a big data environment, automatic ensemble forecasting is preferred over the time-consuming and task-specific model tuning procedure, which is impractical if there are thousands, or even millions, of time series to be forecast.
AB - Improving forecast accuracy is a major goal of statisticians and forecast practitioners. over the years, many advanced models have been proposed in forecasting studies in various science and engineering domains. It is no exception for the fast-moving-consumer-goods (FMCG) demand forecasting. However, in the literature of FMCG forecasting, there are many contradictory conclusions about the best model, typified by the long-lasting »war» between econometrics and neural networks. This is simply because there is no universal model. Whereas one model may outperform another over one dataset, its performance can be rather limited over other datasets. Hence, when forecasting is required for a new dataset, a forecaster is risking a suboptimal performance, if the model selection is based on other datasets. To minimize that risk, ensemble forecasting is often considered. This paper continues from the previous discussion (see Parts I-III) on UPC-level FMCG demand forecasting. Various statistical ensemble techniques are used to combine forecasts made using a collection of component models. It is found that the risk (measured by the spread of model-led error) of using ensemble is smaller than using a single component model. Furthermore, in a big data environment, automatic ensemble forecasting is preferred over the time-consuming and task-specific model tuning procedure, which is impractical if there are thousands, or even millions, of time series to be forecast.
KW - Ensemble
KW - Fast moving consumer goods
KW - Forecast combination
KW - Forecasting
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062587713
U2 - 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622029
DO - 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622029
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85062587713
T3 - Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2018
SP - 3180
EP - 3185
BT - Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2018
A2 - Abe, Naoki
A2 - Liu, Huan
A2 - Pu, Calton
A2 - Hu, Xiaohua
A2 - Ahmed, Nesreen
A2 - Qiao, Mu
A2 - Song, Yang
A2 - Kossmann, Donald
A2 - Liu, Bing
A2 - Lee, Kisung
A2 - Tang, Jiliang
A2 - He, Jingrui
A2 - Saltz, Jeffrey
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 10 December 2018 through 13 December 2018
ER -