Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fatigue-Sensitivity Comparison of sEMG and A-Mode Ultrasound based Hand Gesture Recognition

  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Though physiological signal based human-machine interfaces (HMIs) have recently developed rapidly, their practical use is restricted by many real-world environmental factors, one of which is muscle fatigue. This paper explores the sensitivities between surface electromyography (sEMG) and A-mode ultrasound (AUS) sensing modalities subject to muscle fatigue in the context of hand gesture recognition tasks. Two metrics, mean classification accuracy (mCA) and decline rate (DR), are proposed to evaluate the accuracy and muscle fatigue sensitivity between sEMG and AUS based HMIs. Muscle fatigue inducing experiment was designed and eight subjects were recruited to participate in the experiment. The gesture recognition accuracies of sEMG and AUS under non-fatigue state and fatigue state are compared through Mahalanobis distance based classifier linear discriminant analysis (LDA). In addition, Mahalanobis distance based metrics, repeatability index (RI) and separability index (SI), are introduced to evaluate the changes in the feature distribution during muscle fatigue and reveal the cause of the fatigue sensitivity difference between sEMG and AUS signals. The experimental results demonstrate that the fatigue robustness of AUS signal is better than that of sEMG signal. Specifically, with the employment of the LDA classifier trained under non-fatigue state, the testing accuracy of the sEMG signal on the non-fatigue state is 94.96%, while reduce to 68.26% on the fatigue state. The testing accuracy of the AUS signal on the corresponding states is 99.68% and 91.24% respectively. AUS signal attains higher mCA and lower DR, indicating that it has advantages over sEMG signal in terms of both accuracy and muscle fatigue sensitivity. In addition, the RI and RI/SI analysis reveal that before and after muscle fatigue, the consistency of AUS feature distribution is better than that of sEMG. These research outcomes validate that AUS is more tolerant to feature migration caused by muscle fatigue than sEMG.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1718-1725
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • A-mode ultrasound
  • Gesture recognition
  • muscle fatigue
  • sEMG
  • sensitivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fatigue-Sensitivity Comparison of sEMG and A-Mode Ultrasound based Hand Gesture Recognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this