Abstract
The publisher regrets that the labels and captions for Figures 3 and 11 were inadvertently interchanged/misstated. Specifically, the current caption of Figure 3 incorrectly corresponds to Figure 8 and should instead match the description for Figure 3 as provided in the attached correspondence. Additionally, the caption for Figure 11 should read: “Averaged fluid temperature across three key reactor zones for different flow rates.” Corrected versions of Figures 3 and 11, along with their appropriate captions, are provided in the attached correspondence.[Figure presented] Fig. 3 (a) Mesh-independence test; (b) Validation against reference data.[Figure presented] Fig. 11 Averaged fluid temperature across three key reactor zones for different flow rates. >. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 153539 |
| Journal | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy |
| Volume | 206 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 4 Feb 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to ‘Performance-optimized optical-thermal coupling in high-flux solar simulator-porous media reactor system for high-temperature polygeneration’ [Int J Hydrogen Energy 202 (2026) 152651] (International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2026) 202, (S036031992505654X), (10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152651))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver