Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of wastewater flow direction on sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification processes: operational patterns, denitrification performance and response mechanisms

  • Daheng Ren
  • , Heng Dong
  • , Wenke He
  • , Zhiqiang Zuo
  • , Xiangli Zeng
  • , Xuchen Ba
  • , Yang Yu
  • , Haoran Xu
  • , Guijiao Zhang
  • , Ran Zeng
  • , Jiamin Xu
  • , Na Zhang
  • , Yilu Sun
  • , Linji Xu*
  • , Hao Yi Cheng
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology
  • Ltd
  • Ltd. R&D Branch
  • University of New South Wales
  • CAS - Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
  • Chongqing University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The sulfur autotrophic denitrification packed-bed (SPB) process is widely used in wastewater treatment due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability. However, in practical SPB applications, the selection of wastewater flow direction was arbitrary, and its differences were completely overlooked, which may lead to insufficient filter bed efficiency and unnecessary economic losses. This study systematically evaluated the differences between upflow SPB (USPB) and downflow SPB (DSPB) in terms of clogging rate and denitrification performance, and explored the mechanisms underlying these differences. The results showed that the head loss growth in DSPB followed an exponential increase with an exponent of 4.5, while that in USPB was much lower, with an exponent of 0.6. Meanwhile, USPB also exhibited 1.28 times higher denitrification efficiency than DSPB, demonstrating significantly better performance. The performance difference between the two modes arose from the different accumulation of N2 bubbles. In DSPB, the greater accumulation of N2 bubbles led to the occupation of the voids between sulfur particles (which are used for water flow), resulting in an increase in head loss. The occupation of voids also led to a decrease in the actual hydraulic retention time (AHRT), which in turn resulted in lower denitrification efficiency in DSPB. Moreover, the mixed flow pattern in DSPB was another factor that resulted in worse clogging (higher flow collision) and lower denitrification efficiency (greater short-circuiting) compared to USPB (piston flow). Overall, this study provides fundamental insights for the selection and operation of the SPB process in practical wastewater treatment applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number178477
JournalChemical Engineering Journal
Volume543
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Actual hydraulic residence time
  • N accumulation
  • Sulfur packed-bed
  • Upflow and downflow
  • Wastewater flow pattern

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of wastewater flow direction on sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification processes: operational patterns, denitrification performance and response mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this