Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of optimized intermittent mixing during high-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge: Simulation, performance, and mechanisms

  • School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Inadequate mixing has been proven to be a major cause of anaerobic digester failure. This study revealed the mechanism of mixing intervals on high-solids anaerobic co-digestion (HS-AcoD) of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge (SS). Optimized intermittent mixing time (15 min/h) was determined through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Experimental results indicated that the simulated intermittent mixing could shorten digestion time and increase cumulative methane output (366.8 mL/gVS) compared with continuous mixing and unmixing. Mixing could considerably accelerate substrate solubilization and hydrolysis. Maximum rates of acidogenesis (53.35 %) and methanogenesis (49.41 %) were observed with an optimized intermittent mixing (15 min/h). Vigorous mixing induced apoptosis and disrupted syntrophic metabolism, whereas intermittent mixing promoted the syntrophic metabolism between Syntrophomonas and Methanobacterium, and led to an enrichment of genes involved in acidogenic and methanogenic pathways. These findings have important implications for the development of an optimized intermittent mixing strategy for maximizing HS-AcoD efficiency of FW and SS.

Original languageEnglish
Article number156882
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume842
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
  • Food waste
  • High-solids anaerobic co-digestion
  • Intermittent mixing
  • Sewage sludge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of optimized intermittent mixing during high-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge: Simulation, performance, and mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this