Abstract
Axially moving beams are often discussed with several classic boundary conditions, such as simply-supported ends, fixed ends, and free ends. Here, axially moving beams with generalized boundary conditions are discussed for the first time. The beam is supported by torsional springs and vertical springs at both ends. By modifying the stiffness of the springs, generalized boundaries can replace those classical boundaries. Dynamic stiffness matrices are, respectively, established for axially moving Timoshenko beams and Euler-Bernoulli (EB) beams with generalized boundaries. In order to verify the applicability of the EB model, the natural frequencies of the axially moving Timoshenko beam and EB beam are compared. Furthermore, the effects of constrained spring stiffness on the vibration frequencies of the axially moving beam are studied. Interestingly, it can be found that the critical speed of the axially moving beam does not change with the vertical spring stiffness. In addition, both the moving speed and elastic boundaries make the Timoshenko beam theory more needed. The validity of the dynamic stiffness method is demonstrated by using numerical simulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 911-924 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition) |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jul 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- O326
- Timoshenko beam model
- axially moving beam
- dynamic stiffness matrix
- generalized boundary condition
- natural frequency
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic stiffness method for free vibration of an axially moving beam with generalized boundary conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver