Abstract
The previous studies have shown inconsistent relationship between the valence (positive or negative) of online consumer reviews and consumer decision making. With accessibility/diagnosticity theory, this study attempts to explain this discrepancy through exploring consumer expertise as a moderator. Our results from a 2 * 2 experiment design indicate that the impact of online reviews valence is moderated by consumer expertise: The impact difference between negative reviews and positive reviews is greater for consumers with low expertise than for those with high expertise. Our study adds to the literature relevant with e-WOM effect. And we also provide managerial implications for e-marketers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 484-488 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Computers (Finland) |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Accessibility/diagnosticity theory
- Consumer expertise
- Online consumer reviews
- Valence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does the valence of online consumer reviews matter for consumer decision making? the moderating role of consumer expertise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver