Abstract
Drawing on China's policy practices under the “dual carbon” goal, this study examines how green procurement (GP), a demand-side policy, and green subsidies (GS), a supply-side policy, jointly affect corporate ESG performance. Using panel data of A-share listed industrial firms from 2015 to 2022 and a two-way fixed effects model, the findings show: (1) the GP–GS policy mix significantly enhances ESG performance through complementary “market-locking” and “resource-matching” effects; (2) mechanism analysis identifies three channels—greater information transparency, stronger market competition, and higher green innovation; and (3) heterogeneity tests reveal stronger impacts among heavily polluting firms and in regions with robust institutional environments. By moving beyond single-policy analyses, this study provides evidence on the synergistic optimization of demand- and supply-side environmental policies and offers micro-level insights to refine China's green governance toolkit and strengthen ESG drivers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- ESG performance
- green innovation
- green procurement
- green subsidy
- information transparency
- market competition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Demand Meets Supply: The ESG Impact of Green Procurement and Green Subsidy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver