Abstract
In the capital-constrained newsvendor paradigm, revenue share financing (RSF) presents a novel yet underexplored financing approach. This theoretical study conducts a comparative analysis of two financing methods: traditional debt financing and revenue share financing. Our research findings indicate that the revenue share ratio, cost share ratio, and debt interest rate are the most critical factors influencing retailers’ decisions. This study further demonstrates that, under certain conditions, both financing strategies can yield competitive profit margins and order quantity. Additionally, we discovered that fund providers have a minimum revenue share ratio, whereas for retailers, there is a maximum revenue share ratio. These two ratios establish a bargaining interval within which an optimal revenue share ratio can be achieved if it falls within this range. Outside this range, RSF is either unattainable or impractical.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0329561 |
| Journal | PLOS ONE |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 8 August |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Debt vs. revenue share financing: A theoretical study on revenue share finance in a capital-constrained newsvendor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver