Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross Calibration of '16 MeV Proton Measurements From NOAA POES and EUMETSAT MetOp Satellites

  • Ruilin Lin*
  • , Jichun Zhang
  • , Robert J. Redmon
  • , Binbin Ni
  • , Siqing Liu
  • , Xiaoxin Zhang
  • , Liqin Shi
  • , Jiancun Gong
  • , Dong Chen
  • , Yonghong Cheng
  • , Hong Wang
  • , Yong Cao
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • CAS - National Space Science Center
  • University of New Hampshire
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Wuhan University
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • China Meteorological Administration
  • CAS - Innovation Academy for Microsatellites
  • Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A long-term data set of energetic proton omnidirectional integral fluxes with an 8-s resolution from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Polar Operational Environmental Satellites (POES) and EUMETSAT MetOp satellites from 1978 to 2014 has been investigated comprehensively to capture the data bifurcations, calibration inconsistency, and some erroneous data. There are two categories of the data bifurcations. The upper and lower branches of both bifurcations can be clearly separated by magnetic local time or by magnetic latitude. The calibration inconsistency of POES and MetOp proton omnidirectional integral fluxes ('16 MeV) is solved by fitting the data from each pair of two satellites using a third-degree polynomial function. The fitted curve is almost independent of Lm, B/B0, and time in the valid range. By these fitted functions, the '16 MeV proton omnidirectional integral fluxes from other POES and MetOp satellites are recalibrated to the NOAA-15 measurements that are adopted as the reference standard. Analyses of the recalibrated data at the geomagnetic equator for about 3.5 solar cycles indicate that the maximal and minimal yearly values of '16 MeV proton omnidirectional integral fluxes are in 1987 and in 2002, respectively. By comparisons with the AP8 model predictions, the ratios of the observations in 1987 (in 2002) to the AP8 MIN (AP8 MAX) predictions are mainly within 0.5-3 (0.1-2), showing a dependence on Lm and B/B0.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6906-6926
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume124
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AP8 model
  • EUMETSAT MetOp satellites
  • NOAA POES satellites
  • cross calibration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross Calibration of '16 MeV Proton Measurements From NOAA POES and EUMETSAT MetOp Satellites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this