Abstract
The authors regret that Figs. 7, 8, and 11 in the article are incorrect. Thus, several corrections are necessary to the published version of the manuscript. Specifically: 1. In Fig. 7 the word 'BEM' in the middle of Fig. 7(a) and (b) should be deleted. In addition, the label 'Intensity (106 W/sr)' should be replaced with 'Intensity (107 W/sr)'. The revised version has been given as follows. 2. In Fig. 8, the order of the label '(b) H2O mass fraction' and '(c) CO2 mass fraction' should be exchanged. The revised version has been given as follows. 3. In Fig. 11(a), the label 'Mean value (106 W/sr)' should be replaced with 'Mean value (107 W/sr)'. In Fig. 11(b), the label 'SD (105 W/sr)' should be replaced with 'SD (106 W/sr)'. The revised version has been given as follows. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103428 |
| Journal | Infrared Physics and Technology |
| Volume | 109 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “NIPC-based uncertainty analysis of infrared radiation from rocket exhaust plumes caused by nozzle exit conditions” [Infrared Phys. Technol. 108 (2020) 103376] (Infrared Physics and Technology (2020) 108, (S1350449520304242), (10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103376))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver