Abstract
The authors regret that the TEM result and the corresponding element distribution in Fig. 14c and d are errors. The author used the wrong specimen during TEM analysis. However, the results in Fig. 14a and b are correct. The revised version is as follows: Elemental segregation of the weld was also detected by TEM. As shown in Fig. 14a, the dominating precipitate was indeed Al3Fe in view of the diffraction pattern. The O element distribution was irregular, as shown in Fig. 14b, meaning that the precipitation of Al3Fe was not susceptible for O element.[Formula presented] The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 111387 |
| Journal | Vacuum |
| Volume | 204 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Oct 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Microstructural analysis and mechanical property optimization for TP347HFG steel/6082 aluminum alloy electron beam welded joint” (Vacuum (2022) 203, (S0042207X22003839), (10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111259))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver