Abstract
Circulating fluidized beds (CFBs) for flue gas desulfurization (FGD) are widely used in small- and medium-scale power plants. However, even with multi-venturi tubes and guide plates, several problems, including the flow field deviation, axial velocity non-uniformity in the tower, and bad load adaptability to the boiler, are still encountered. To address these issues, the axial composite fluidization mode (ACFM) and tangential composite fluidization mode (TCFM) are developed. These modes form swirl flow using composite fluidization devices. The present study conducted laboratory-scale research to examine the regulations of venturi fluidization mode (VFM), ACFM, and TCFM. We found that the flow field for ACFM and TCFM is significantly improved. The turbulent kinetic energy and particle concentration for ACFM and TCFM are higher than those for VFM. A pilot research on Dual CFB-FGD with ACFM was conducted in a 145. MW unit power plant. The results show that CFB resistance is increased by 200 to 300. Pa compared with VFM, and its axial velocity and temperature profiles in the tower diameters are uniform. The CFB unit has good load adaptability to the boiler, high desulfurization at low Ca/S, and high approach to adiabatic saturation temperature. ACFM can weaken particle adhesion to the tower wall.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 46-53 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Powder Technology |
| Volume | 215-216 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Axial composite fluidization mode (ACFM)
- Circulating fluidization bed (CFB)
- Flue gas desulfurization (FGD)
- Swirl flow
- Tangential composite fluidization mode (TCFM)
- Uniformity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Composite fluidization in a circulating fluidized bed for flue gas desulfurization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver