Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison between magnetic coplanarity and MVA methods in determining the normal of Venusian bow shock

  • Li Can Shan
  • , Quan Ming Lu
  • , Tie Long Zhang
  • , Xin Liang Gao
  • , Can Huang
  • , Yan Qing Su
  • , Shui Wang
  • University of Science and Technology of China

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

With the measurements of magnetic field of Venus Express (VEX), magnetic coplanarity and minimum variance analysis (MVA) methods are analyzed and their validity is tested to determine the normal of Venusian bow shocks. It is found that MVA method is the better than magnetic coplanarity, and 95% shock crossings can be accurately determined by the method. However, the occurrence of the shock normal which is not determined accurately by magnetic coplanarity increases with the decrease of the solar zenith angle (SZA). At the same time, compared with quasi-parallel shocks, there is more occurrence of the shock normal which cannot be determined accurately by magnetic coplanarity for quasi-perpendicular shocks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2469-2472
Number of pages4
JournalChinese Science Bulletin
Volume58
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • MVA
  • Venusian bow shock
  • magnetic coplanarity
  • shock normal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between magnetic coplanarity and MVA methods in determining the normal of Venusian bow shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this