Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Dosimetry: IMRT versus 3DCRT in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients with Considering Some Organs in Out-of – Field Borders

  • Shaimaa G. Ghazy
  • , Mostafa A. Abdel-Maksoud
  • , Ibrahim A. Saleh
  • , Mohamed A. El-Tayeb
  • , Amr A. Elsaid
  • , Metwally A. Kotb
  • , Diana A. Al-Sherif
  • , Heba S. Ramadan
  • , Ahmed Elwahsh
  • , Ahmed M. Hussein*
  • , Ahmad S. Kodous*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Armed Forces Medical Complex
  • King Saud University
  • Zarqa University
  • Alexandria University
  • Sixth October University
  • Johannes Kepler University Linz
  • University of Brescia
  • University of Vienna
  • Al-Azhar University
  • Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (Deemed to be University)
  • Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The local management approach for node-positive breast cancer has undergone substantial evolution. Consequently, there exists a pressing need to enhance our treatment strategies by placing greater emphasis on planning and dosimetric factors, given the availability of more conformal techniques and delineation criteria, achieving optimal goals of radiotherapy treatment. The primary aim of this article is to discuss how the extent of regional nodal coverage influences the choice between IMRT and 3D radiation therapy for patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 15 patients diagnosed with left breast cancer with disease involved lymph nodes were included in this study. Delivering the recommended dose required the use of a linear accelerator (LINAC) with photon beams energy of 6 mega voltage (6MV). Each patient had full breast radiation using two planning procedures: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D conformal). Following the guidelines set forth by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), the planned treatment coverage was carefully designed to fall between 95% and 107% of the recommended dose. Additionally, Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs) were generated the dose distribution within these anatomical contours. Results and Conclusion: The DVH parameters were subjected to a comparative analysis, focusing on the doses absorbed by both Organs at Risk (OARs) and the Planning Target Volume (PTV). The findings suggest that low doses in IMRT plan might raise the risk of adverse oncological outcomes or potentially result in an increased incidence of subsequent malignancies. Consequently, the adoption of inverse IMRT remains limited, and the decision to opt for this therapy should be reserved for situations where it is genuinely necessary to uphold a satisfactory quality of life. Additionally, this approach helps in reducing the likelihood of developing thyroid problems and mitigates the risk of injuries to the supraclavicular area and the proximal head of the humerus bone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-582
Number of pages16
JournalBreast Cancer: Targets and Therapy
Volume16
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • LINAC
  • RTOG
  • breast cancer
  • photon exposure and secondary cancer risk
  • radiotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of Dosimetry: IMRT versus 3DCRT in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients with Considering Some Organs in Out-of – Field Borders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this