Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CEC with tris (2,2′-bipyridyl) ruthenium (II) electrochemiluminescent detection

  • Haijuan Li
  • , Xiaoqing Liu
  • , Wenxin Niu
  • , Shuyun Zhu
  • , Lishuang Fan
  • , Lihong Shi
  • , Guobao Xu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • CAS - Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

For the first time, CEC was coupled with tris(2,2-bipyridyl) ruthenium(II) (Ru(bpy)32+ electrochemiluminescence detection. Efficient CEC separations of proline, putrescine, spermidine and spermine were achieved when the pH of the mobile phase is in the range of 3.5-7.0. The optimum mobile phase for CEC separation is much less acidic than that for CZE separation, which matches better with the optimum pH for Ru(bpy)32+ electrochemiluminescence detection and dramatically shortens the analysis time because of larger EOF at higher pH. The time for CEC separation of the polyamines is less than 12.5 min, which is about half as much as the time needed for CZE. The detection limits were 1.7, 0.2, and 0.2 μM for putrescine, spermidine, and spermine, respectively. The RSD of retention time and peak height of these polyamines were less than 0.85 and 6.1%, respectively. The column showed good long-term stability, and the RSD of retention time is below 5% for 150 runs over one-month use. The method was successfully used for the determination of polyamines in urine samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4475-4481
Number of pages7
JournalElectrophoresis
Volume29
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Amines
  • CEC
  • Electrochemiluminescence
  • Electrochemistry
  • Ruthenium

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CEC with tris (2,2′-bipyridyl) ruthenium (II) electrochemiluminescent detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this