Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Can you change my generosity towards future others? The impact of observability on intertemporal pro-social decisions

  • School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that delays in realizing pro-social decisions significantly influence pro-social choices. However, the impact of time delay may vary by context. A key contextual factor is decision observability (i.e., the visibility of one's decision to others). Using a dictator game task with delayed rewards, the current study examined the effects of observability on intertemporal pro-social choices. Subjects were randomly assigned to either an Anonymous group, where payment was private, or an Observable group, involving public payment. They had to decide between the selfish option (which only benefited the subject) and the generous option (sharing money with another person in a specific delay condition). Our data revealed that subjects were less eager to forgo money when time delay increased and showed more selfishness toward specific people, independent of decision observability. This pattern was aligned with a hyperbolic discounting model. Notably, observability mitigated the impact of time delay; subjects were more inclined to donate to temporally distant individuals when their decisions were observable instead of anonymous. In addition, we discuss the practical implications of observability for designing intertemporal donation appeals.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2365
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • anonymity
  • decision observability
  • donations
  • generosity
  • intertemporal pro-social discounting
  • time delay

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can you change my generosity towards future others? The impact of observability on intertemporal pro-social decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this