Abstract
An innovative Al electrocoagulation (EC) technology for phosphate removal was proposed via cathode regulation using typical cathodes (Al, Ti, Cu, stainless steel, and graphite). At a current density (CD) of 2.5 A/m2, all EC systems displayed excellent phosphate removal (>99 %, 20 min). The graphite cathode had the lowest electrochemical resistance, reducing the costs by 68 %−79 % than the Al cathode (1.25−5 A/m2). The addition of NaCl effectively reduced the energy consumption of Al EC. SO42– and NO3– showed non-significant effects on the costs of Al-G EC (p > 0.05). Ca2+ and Mg2+ at 50 mM increased the costs of Al-Al EC by 17 % and 20 %, respectively. Al-G EC reduced the costs by 67 % than Al-Al EC in the presence of HA. The nanosized flocs from Al-G EC showed higher zeta potentials and smaller pore diameter (8.98 nm), beneficial for phosphate adsorption. The lower HER activity of graphite cathode effectively prevented a rapid pH increase during Al-G EC, thereby regulating the formation of medium and large polymeric species (Alb and Alc). The continuous-flow test (120 h) further demonstrated the advantage of Al-G EC regarding phosphate removal and operating costs. Overall, this study provided a cost-effective strategy for Al EC via selecting suitable cathodes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 108323 |
| Journal | Process Safety and Environmental Protection |
| Volume | 206 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Jan 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Al electrocoagulation
- Cathode
- Mechanism
- Operating costs
- Phosphate removal
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can the performance of Al electrocoagulation for phosphate removal be regulated via cathode material selection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver