Abstract
Compared to traditional CFD models, weather research and forecasting model (WRF) can more realistically reproduce complex spatio-temporally varying wind fields under extreme weather disasters like typhoon. However, the large-eddy simulation mode of WRF (WRF-LES) to predict engineering-scale turbulence has yet to be clarified in terms of different turbulence models. This study selected a three-dimensional hill as the research object. We focus on separated flow past a 3D hill to systematically revisit the influence of four turbulence models (SMAG, TKE, NBA1, NBA2). The results show that four classical turbulence models under the default conditions can only reproduce the turbulent structure of the post-hill separation to a certain extent and that the nonlinear models (NBA1 and NBA2) simulate more hairpin vortices and small-scale vortex structures than the linear models (SMAG and TKE). Then, the parameter sensitivity is clarified by adjusting key parameters of four classical WRF-LES turbulence models. The results show that the ability of the linear models to simulate the separated flow and small-scale vortex structure is sensitive to the vortex viscosity coefficient. Once the nonlinear models are used, the simulation results are insensitive to the backscatter coefficient variation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105910 |
| Journal | Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics |
| Volume | 254 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- 3D hill
- Large eddy simulation
- Small-scale vortex structures
- Turbulence models
- WRF
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of turbulence model effects on WRF-LES of separated turbulent flows past a 3D hill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver