TY - GEN
T1 - Application of Landweber with Optimization for Small Footprint Waveform Lidar Decomposition
AU - Xiao, Zhen
AU - Gu, Yanfeng
AU - Li, Xian
AU - Zhang, Xiangrong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Small-footprint waveform LiDAR requires waveform decomposition for accurate target structure characterization. To improve the ability for identifying close targets, this paper first introduces the Landweber (LW) deconvolution method to decompose the small-footprint LiDAR waveforms. Our study emphasizes the advantages of the deconvolution methods in capturing more targets of waveforms. Generally, the LW approach introduced with optimization excels in detecting more targets after false target removal. Experiments were conducted on datasets collected under various conditions using small-footprint waveform LiDAR system. The findings highlight an average target distance error of 0.083m, showcasing superior performance compared to direct decomposition methods. When compared with the GOLD and RL methods, the decomposition accuracy is nearly indistinguishable, but the success rates are higher. Our research establishes the LW method as a viable waveform decomposition method, contributing to the diversity of choices for waveform data processing.
AB - Small-footprint waveform LiDAR requires waveform decomposition for accurate target structure characterization. To improve the ability for identifying close targets, this paper first introduces the Landweber (LW) deconvolution method to decompose the small-footprint LiDAR waveforms. Our study emphasizes the advantages of the deconvolution methods in capturing more targets of waveforms. Generally, the LW approach introduced with optimization excels in detecting more targets after false target removal. Experiments were conducted on datasets collected under various conditions using small-footprint waveform LiDAR system. The findings highlight an average target distance error of 0.083m, showcasing superior performance compared to direct decomposition methods. When compared with the GOLD and RL methods, the decomposition accuracy is nearly indistinguishable, but the success rates are higher. Our research establishes the LW method as a viable waveform decomposition method, contributing to the diversity of choices for waveform data processing.
KW - Landweber
KW - Waveform LiDAR
KW - deconvolution
KW - waveform decomposition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85204896693
U2 - 10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10640890
DO - 10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10640890
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85204896693
T3 - International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)
SP - 6408
EP - 6411
BT - IGARSS 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2024
Y2 - 7 July 2024 through 12 July 2024
ER -