Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An experimental study on stainless steel hybrid tubular joints with square braces and circular chord

  • Ran Feng*
  • , Chaoqun Wu
  • , Zhenming Chen
  • , Krishanu Roy*
  • , Boshan Chen
  • , James B.P. Lim
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen
  • China Construction Science and Industry Corporation LTD
  • The University of Auckland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of the load-carrying capacities of stainless steel hybrid tubular X-, T- and Y-joints with square braces and circular chord under monotonic loading. In total, 18 tests are reported on hybrid tubular X-, T- and Y-joints, including 9 tests on X-joints, 4 tests on T-joints and the remaining 5 tests on Y-joints. All test specimens were made from austenitic stainless steel of grade AISI 304. The material properties of the test specimens were determined by tensile coupon tests. The failure modes, load-carrying capacities and axial load versus displacement and deformation curves were obtained for all test specimens. The influences of brace width-to-chord diameter ratio (β) on the failure modes and load-carrying capacities of tubular joints were considered. For the specimens with small β value, the chord face plastification was more likely to occur and there was no obvious peak load observed in the load-displacement and load-deformation curves. For the specimens with large β value, the chord side wall failure was dominant. The clear peak load was observed in the load-displacement and load-deformation curves. The test strengths are compared with the results predicted by the current design rules in accordance with International Committee for the Development and Study of Tubular Structures (CIDECT) (2001), Eurocode 3 (EC3) (2005), Chinese Code (GB50017) (2017) and Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS) (2001). Upon comparison, it is found that the joint strengths calculated using AS/NZS (2001) are larger than test strengths by 2% on average. It is shown that the design formulae provided by CIDECT (2001), EC3 (2005) and GB50017 (2017) are conservative by around 6%, 19% and 20%, respectively, when compared to the test strengths.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106919
JournalThin-Walled Structures
Volume155
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Circular chord
  • Experimental investigation
  • Hybrid joint
  • Square brace
  • Stainless steel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental study on stainless steel hybrid tubular joints with square braces and circular chord'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this