Abstract
Four oxidation processes involved ozonation (O3), ultraviolet irradiation (UV), O3/UV and TiO2/UV to degrade mono- and tri-chloroacetic acids present in drinking water were compared. The results showed that ozonation was relatively inefficient for the destruction of the chloroacetic acids tested. UV irradiation was much more efficient than ozonation. But the combination of UV with either O3 or TiO2 powder did not make much difference. It was found that fiber-TiO2/UV was the best combination of the four oxidation processes tested, especially in regards to the refractory tri-chloroacetic acids. The TiO2 fiber was highly practical because it is easily separated and recovered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1811-1816 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
| Event | 1st National Conference on environmental Simulation and Pollution Control - Beijing, China Duration: 4 Nov 1999 → 5 Nov 1999 |
Keywords
- Chloroacetic acids
- Drinking water
- Ozonation
- TiO
- UV irradiation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Advanced oxidations of chloroacetic acids present in drinking water'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver