Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A three-step model for optimizing coil spacings inside cuboid-shaped magnetic shields

  • Tianhao Liu
  • , Allard Schnabel
  • , Jens Voigt
  • , Zhiyin Sun*
  • , Liyi Li
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
  • Harbin Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A three-step model for calculating the magnetic field generated by coils inside cuboid-shaped shields like magnetically shielded rooms (MSRs) is presented. The shield is modeled as two parallel plates of infinite width and one tube of infinite height. We propose an improved mirror method that considers the effect of the parallel plates of finite thickness. A reaction factor is introduced to describe the influence of the vertical tube, which is obtained from finite element method (FEM) simulations. By applying the improved mirror method and then multiplying the result with the reaction factor, the magnetic flux density within the shielded volume can be determined in a fast computation. The three-step model is verified with both FEM and measurements of the field of a Helmholtz coil inside an MSR with a superconducting quantum interference device. The model allows a fast optimization of shield-coupled coil spacings compared to repetitive, time-consuming FEM calculations. As an example, we optimize the distance between two parallel square coils attached to the MSR walls. Measurements of a coil prototype of 2.75 m side length show a magnetic field change of 18 pT over the central 5 cm at the field strength of 2.7 μT. This obtained relative field change of 6 ppm is a factor of 5.4 smaller than our previously used Helmholtz coil.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115004
JournalAIP Advances
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A three-step model for optimizing coil spacings inside cuboid-shaped magnetic shields'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this