Abstract
We consider a three-member organization in which one member retires in each period and the incumbent members vote to admit a candidate to fill the vacancy. Candidates differ in quality and belong to one of two types, and majority-type members share the total rent of that period. We characterize the symmetric Markov equilibria with undominated strategies and compare the long-term welfare among them. Unanimity voting is better than majority voting at promoting long-term welfare. In addition, organizations with a certain degree of incongruity perform better in the long run than either harmonious or very divided organizations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 94-130 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | American Economic Journal: Microeconomics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A theory of organizational dynamics: Internal politics and efficiency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver