Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A review of studies on citations and journal ranking in finance

  • Haifeng Guo
  • , Bo Wang*
  • , Xiaotuo Qiao
  • , Renhui Liu
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review studies on ranking in finance journals, which have grown substantially in recent decades. Design/methodology/approach – This paper depicts the trend and development of ranking studies in finance area, describes the regional work and lists the studies which focus on specific journal. This paper discusses some important and possible issues of ranking studies in finance in the future and makes some conclusions. Findings – First, the authors find that the assessing method has changed from counting number to citation-based method. Second, the authors sort the ranking studies which focus on the research and publication quality based on regional area. Finally, in specific journal ranking studies, the authors can find how a journal reputation has changed, better or worse. Originality/value – This paper reviews the ranking studies in finance area and particularly focusses on three parts. Because of the importance of ranking studies in research quality assessing, a series of issues are raised to improve the assessing objectiveness of journal ranking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-311
Number of pages9
JournalManagerial Finance
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • Assessing method
  • Journal ranking
  • Research quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of studies on citations and journal ranking in finance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this