Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A method to recover critical bits under a double error in SEC-DED protected memories

  • Shanshan Liu*
  • , Pedro Reviriego
  • , Liyi Xiao
  • , Juan Antonio Maestro
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Harbin Institute of Technology
  • Antonio de Nebrija University

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Single Error Correction Double Error Detection (SEC-DED) codes are widely used to protect memories from soft errors due to their simple implementation. However, the limitation is that the double bit errors can just be detected but cannot be recovered by SEC-DED codes. In this paper, a method to recover some of the bits when a double error occurs is presented. This can be of interest for applications on which some bits store important information, for example control flags or the more significant bits of a value. For those, the proposed technique can in some cases determine whether those bits have been affected by the double error and when not, safely recover the correct values. However, the percentage of times that the bits can be recovered is small. The proposed scheme is also extended to increase this percentage by duplicating or triplicating the critical bits inside the word when there are spare bits. No modification to the decoding circuitry is needed, as the scheme can be implemented in the exception handler that is executed when a double error occurs. This facilitates the use of the proposed scheme in existing designs. Another option is to implement part of the scheme in hardware something that can be done with low cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-96
Number of pages5
JournalMicroelectronics Reliability
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Error correction codes
  • Memory
  • Single Error Correction Double Error Detection (SEC-DED)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A method to recover critical bits under a double error in SEC-DED protected memories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this