Abstract
Torrefaction is a promising method for producing microalgal solid biofuel. This study compared conventional torrefaction and oxidative torrefaction for microalgal solid biofuel production. Particular attention was paid to evaluating energy efficiency analysis and life cycle assessment, and several parameters and indexes were adopted and calculated. The results showed that mild oxidative torrefaction was the most energy-efficient operation, with the maximum value of relative upgrading energy index and relative energy return on investment. The life cycle assessment indicates that oxidative torrefaction had a lower environmental impact than conventional torrefaction, mainly due to its lower carrier gas consumption and electricity input. The environmental impact positively correlated with the torrefaction severity. The obtained results in this study can provide new insights on improving the cognition of energy efficiency evaluation and environmental impact assessment of the torrefaction process, which helps select optimal torrefaction conditions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 133236 |
| Journal | Journal of Cleaner Production |
| Volume | 369 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Oct 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Biochar
- Energy efficiency analysis
- Environmental impact assessment
- Life cycle assessment (LCA)
- Microalgae
- Torrefaciton
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of conventional and oxidative torrefaction of microalga Nannochloropsis Oceanica through energy efficiency analysis and life cycle assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver